Russian 2016 US Presidential hacking

The US IC report was that the very successful Russian hacking of US computers was intended to ensure that the electorate would vote for Hilary and thus ensure the ousting of The Donald.

Actually, the narrative of the US elite, powerful and the good, was according to the Huffington Post, that, Hilary would win by 98.2%. The New York Times on Election Day predicted that Hilary would win by 85%.

More incredibly, Newsweek sent out 250,000 copies of a commemorative magazine with Hilary's smiling face on the cover with the headline:

Madam President

If you want of copy of this magazine you can get a copy it on eBay at a cost between $75.00 to $2,500.00.

It was this narrative of the US elite, powerful and the good,  rather than the Russian hacking that was intended to ensure that the electorate would vote for Hilary and thus ensure the ousting of The Donald.

When it was disclosed that 85 of 154 donors to the Clinton foundation had a privileged audience with Hilary when she was Secretary of State, the New York Times would not print it.

Since The Donald's win, the US elite, powerful and the good, has been so devastated and exposed that to cover its arse it is now looking hither and dither to put blame on whoever they can target. Ideally it would be on The Donald.

However, with each passing day as he fits better and better and more and more into the mantle of Office of President of the US, you can now surmise the quandary the US elite, powerful and the good, is now in. 

I think that it might just be too late now for the CIA to have one last shot at shoving their finger up . . . !