infinite
omniscient
omnipotent.
Now, when Henry VIII was alive and reigned in England and Wales, his power was abolute in all matters including matters of life and death. In his time, there were none of the 21st Century means of travel and communication.
In his reign over 80% of the peasant lived in his outworld , i.e. outside of London and of the great houses that was his wont to visit. These peasants lived, laboured, suffered, bred their kind, died and never saw him. Thus, they would have been quite entitled to say:
I don't believe he exists.
By the same token apropos argumentations re whether a God or exists, no one could really prove if Henry VIII did exist nor could he be proved not to , to any of these peasants.
So, as to whether She exists or not, we think the best way is to put before you the evidence that we have that index Her existence:
In the beginning of time, High Physics is now quite sure that prio to the emergence of the singularity that exploded into the Hubble Big Bang, there was NOTHING. What there was, was a void that had no space and no number. Then VOILA, the singularity IS. And in it are all the Laws of Physics that will determine how things are to unfold. According to the First Law of Physics, this singularity was to explode. And so it does. It is the explostion of the Hubble Big Bang.
From them on the Laws of Physics, a la Stephen Hawking come into operation. In time, some 13.7 billion years later, by these Laws we come to be.
The have a question?
We, in the West, live in different nation states plus the current conglomerate know as the EU. All are governed by laws. Did you know that there is a logic to all these laws of the nations of the West and the EU.
You may not know what its logic is, but it is there. If it was not there, all these Laws would be random and chaotic.
By the same token there is a Logic that oversees all the Laws of Physics. So, this is the question?
What or who was this insubtantial THING
that the imputed its insubstantial LOGIC into the singularity?
We are derivatives of these Laws of Physics. What we are sure of is this, in us a copy of this LOGIC. The copy of this Logic in us is a finite copy. It is a copy of its grammar, syntax, semantics and language.
This name of this finite copy in us is
the Light of God.
This Light of God has been seen by High Tibetan Lamas leaving the dying that they were caring for. This is so recorded in the Tibetan Book of the Dead.
In our work, we have developed a model to reverse a cancer. Our model hinges on the presupposition that to reverse a cancer you have to have power, not aggression and fight. The power we allude to is the power of Light of God. In applying our model we have reversed the cancers of our clients.
Then on 22 October 2012 we were to receive a 24 page document from Alan Patching in Australia to inform us of his results using our model to reverse a cancer. He had done so for a cancer of the Pancreas and a second one of the tongue with secondaries in the brain.
In contemporary science, positive results from laboratory is insufficient. You have to have a second laboratory to confirm your findings. Alan Patchings 24 page document was therefore an incredible gift and relief to us.
It is now with his corroboration that we are able to write the book
on:
How to Reverse a Cancer.
We have had to wait from 1999 to 2013 to write this work.
As we stated above conceptually God is an insubstantial entity. Akin to Her is the long held idea of spirits, good and evil ones. We now would ask you to go to the home page of our web
and scroll down to the posted videos.
You will see the confirmation by the witness of a person of what was for her the benefits when a manouevre of Deposession was applied to her and freed her of her mother's spirit.
This is the second video tape of such a case of Depossession that we have. We have never talked about or released the information of the first one. We did not want to become involved in controversy.
However, times have changed. We hope that people will take what is shared here as information that stand on their own merits.
However, if one wishes to debate about such matters, please let us know. With you and others who wish to be the principle speakers, we will have to:
decide how many speakers to have for each side
agree on who is to be the neutral chair person
determine where, when and time to have the debate
agree upon the rules and manner of the debate
the form of the wording of the resolution
the result of the vote on the resolution and its
publication
how to promote and advertize the debate.
Given what we have shared here with you about God and hence theism, you can see how concerned we are about atheism and for atheists.
No comments:
Post a Comment