This cardinal is man-of-a-special class, to wit a priest of the RC Church.
Men of his class have pursued homosexual relationships in the style of rampant libidinous flippant and uncommitted trysts with boys, youths and men.
However, when an attempt is made to engage in a permanent, loving relationship he condems it?!
Where is the difference - with the former, I have never read of a formal condemnation by the RC Chuch of its miscreants, but with the latter he voices his negativity.
Perhaps someone can illume me as to this anomaly - as I see it!
No comments:
Post a Comment